
Image: Subject and photographer unknown.

Took this shot the other evening with my Nikon D70 having borrowed a friends lens+converter for 20 minutes. Pretty pleased with the results although I did have to crawl through a marshy patch of thistles to get close enough!
I’m sure if you’ve ever tried to get close to a Hare you will understand how tricky this shot was - he is no pet rabbit, that’s for sure!
I’m a big fan of Hares and am quite blessed in the fact that so many live near my cottage in rural Kings Ripton, Cambridgeshire. I only had to walk 200 yards to find this old chap.


Tattoos definitely suit some guys (as the images accompanying this post attest) but the Rev. Peter Mullen’s recent idea of certain types of tattoos for homosexuals is just plain wacky.
Petting aside the medieval absurdity of the Reverend’s suggestion, not to mention the matter of his sanity, the proposal seemed oddly illogical even on its own terms. There’s the obvious fact that fellatio is often performed by a woman upon her male sex partner, who might even be her husband, so unless the reverend is on a war against fellatio itself (which is quite possible), he may want to rethink the whole “fellatio kills” idea.
Furthermore, there seems to be a design flaw in the proposed warning labels, both of which appear next to an orifice that could be penetrated by a male phallus whose owner is the supposed target of these messages. As it happens, the “top” in either of these sex acts is almost never the party at risk of infection or other harm; surely he should be the one bearing these dire tattoos next to that occasional disseminator of ills. But if health is the concern, and not just morality, then it hardly makes sense to restrict the tattooing to gay men; nor would the Reverend be the first to suggest that the male generative organ should come with a warning label.


NOTE: I've had reports of readers not being able to access this blog and/or pages of it because they get stuck on the “Sensitive Content” warning page which redirects back to itself every time they try to click through. I'm not sure what the issue is, though it might be a problem stemming from when the site shifted from http to https. Accordingly, it should be resolved when you add https:// to the front of the link for the page you are trying to access.